Search for: "Persons v. Jones"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
Jones, 2012) is a “search;” and that employing a “thermal heat imager” from a police car on a public road (Kyllo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
" 'Neither a detailed description of the search nor a personal statement from the person who actually conducted the search is required' " (Matter of Jackson v Albany County Dist. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
" 'Neither a detailed description of the search nor a personal statement from the person who actually conducted the search is required' " (Matter of Jackson v Albany County Dist. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:01 pm
Jones—the justices’ first real encounter with digital surveillance. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project today amended our complaint in ACLU v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:46 am
Watch the Deliberate Resistance: LGBT Prisoner Rights 20 Years After Farmer v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 7:20 am
In US v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
JONES, Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:02 am
" And in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 9:43 am
Jones v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
The 2019 email was personal data because the receiver, a member of the public, was able to identify the Claimant as one of the persons to which it related [102]. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:22 am
Medtronic v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
“The analysis appears to be very similar to the approach that was taken in [Canada (Human Rights Commission) v.] [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
See, e.g., Jones v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
The appeal was allowed, with the Circuit Judge relying on the dictum of May LJ in Jones v MBNA International Bank Ltd (2000) EWCA Civ 314 at (52) that there may be exceptional cases in which the principle of finality would not be applied such that new arguments could be raised on appeal. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
Farey-Jones, 359 F.3d 1066, 1075 (9th Cir. 2004); Fraser v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
Knight v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm
Wood v. [read post]
