Search for: "Rolling v. State" Results 2161 - 2180 of 4,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Ramos in Goldstein v Pikus, 2015 NY Slip Op 31455(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 20, 2015], dismissing a petition for judicial dissolution of a New York limited liability company. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Majority position in White-Smith is structural: absent machine, piano roll is unintelligible. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These include digital forensic preservation and investigation, notification of a broad range of third parties and other constituencies,[1] fulfillment of state and federal compliance obligations, potential litigation, engagement with law enforcement, the provision of credit monitoring, crisis management, a communications plan – and the list goes on. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
” As the news on Iran rolls in, Defense One reminds us that the Senate heads out for the August recess today---and so September will be the key month for Congress to debate and vote on the nuclear deal. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
” As the news on Iran rolls in, Defense One reminds us that the Senate heads out for the August recess today---and so September will be the key month for Congress to debate and vote on the nuclear deal. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Lockridge with Attorney Jerry SabbotaLong-challenged in other states and repeatedly addressed at the SCOTUS, the Michigan Supreme Court finally abandoned the state legislature's attempt at a mandatory indeterminate sentencing scheme in favor of giving sentencing judges more powers.The case that got the ball rolling back in 2013 was a homicide case -of course- from right here in Oakland County. [read post]
The news has been full of stories about the far reaching decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States, or SCOTUS, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm by mdkeenan
These types of charges are extraordinarily easy for the state to prove. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Remarkably, the Court has only focused on this substantive question at all in one case, Burns v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
P.S: While reading S v Mamabolo again for this blog, I was struck by this comment by the Court, so apposite too to the Al-Bashir saga. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
 Scarcely less sad is the scrap over the annotated statute laws of the State of Georgia, recorded by Andy Johnstone on the same weblog. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am by INFORRM
The leading judgment was given by the President of the Court, Lord Neuberger, and the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson. [read post]