Search for: "State v. D. M. B."
Results 2161 - 2180
of 3,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
Vanhorn v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:23 am
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve probably heard that a little over two months ago, New York State Governor Andrew M. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:16 am
v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:25 pm
For example, under proposed subsection “B. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
§ 157(b)(2)(A), (M), & (O). [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
From McMurtrie v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
B (Mem. from James M. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm
B is for Black v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
M. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 1:43 am
Garbolino, James D. and Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
You can have statutes that simply list elements (A + B + C = crime) or that have alternate ways of fulfilling the elements (A + B + C or D or E = crime). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
L.R. (6th) 26, rev’d on other grounds 2018 SCC 21, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 633, but disagreed on their application. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
Ohio, Eddings v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
M. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am
Ann. tit. 22 § 1089(D)(8)(b), and the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ application of the statute in this case deny the petitioner an adequate corrective process for the hearing and determination of his newly available federal constitutional claim in violation of his rights under the 14th Amendment’s due process and equal protection clauses. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:42 am
I’ve often bewailed the disparities in sentencing that have resulted from the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
