Search for: "State v. English"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2017, 9:46 pm
It can be used in lieu of the traditional materials in legal English or similar approaches. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:20 am
The attorney was charged with obstruction and making false statements related to a Food and Drug Administration investigation into drug promotions (United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:40 am
Answer: No, according to the English High Court[3]. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
English) influence. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 10:35 am
They derive from an old English law. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:18 am
The decision in Burrage v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:50 pm
In a 10-page concurrence last month in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
While use of a mark does not necessarily translate into that mark becoming distinctive of the user, in the absence of any other candidate mark by which consumers might identify the origin of the goods or services, the substantial use of a mark is a good start to proving that it has acquired distinctiveness.This evidence related to use and distinctiveness of the marks in the UK and the judge was therefore satisfied that by 19 May 2014, when Sofaworks filed its counterclaim for invalidity, the mark… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm
Lartigue v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
The Eleventh Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 12:54 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 2:50 am
The abuse of law test is whether the sole purpose of joining a defendant is to sue them other than in their Member State of domicile. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:53 pm
Becerra v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:21 am
by Dennis Crouch Oil States Energy Services, LLC, v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:43 am
Those who believe that the Dodd-Frank Act displaces the FVRA – and therefore, that English should sit as CFPB interim director – rely on a theory of statutory construction that says that when two statutes conflict, the more specific statute should be given greater strength (see United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:32 am
Lessons from English v. [read post]
