Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2020, 1:54 pm
As previously stated, the Supreme Court has made clear that the government may rescind DACA, if it complies with the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm
Following this apparent defiance of the Supreme Court’s ruling, a federal district court issued a decision explicitly stating that the Administration must restore DACA to its pre-September 2017 status, which means accepting new applications. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Leopold v US No.18-5276, an investigative court reporter applied to the district court to unseal various court orders relating to electronic surveillance. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Most of these were anonymous, but the first phone call revealed Scardina’s name on the caller-identification screen on Phillips’s phone. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
The government referenced Vasquez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
The plaintiff failed to state a claim for Monell liability against the city, and the district court’s award of summary judgment as to it was affirmed. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
The district court also rejected the state leaders’ proposed remedy of a 40-day extension. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:22 pm
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court (consolidated with Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
“No circuit court of appeals has addressed the question of whether BMS applies to FLSA collective actions, and the district courts nationwide are split,” the district court explained. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
United States, the Court held that new Fourth Amendment precedent must apply retroactively. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
District Court, where new complaints slowed or held steady and arguments were generally handled differently, but both venues released rulings that were felt far beyond the 2,000 square miles of the First State. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia (in what became Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
” Id.The collateral order doctrineAs a general rule, the jurisdictional reach of thefederal appellate courts extends only to “final decisions ofthe district courts of the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:19 pm
The first case, Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
District court: Dismissed. Eighth Circuit: Dismissal may have been correct under our old precedent, but the Supreme Court's recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am
The court’s final decisions of the October 2019 term, Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
Roberts said the court in the 1997 case Clinton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:38 am
PanamaThe Case of Ricardo MartinelliDecision Date: August 26, 2019 The First Oral Judicial Circuit Court of Panama ruled that the former President of Panama, Ricardo Martinelli, was not guilty of the interception of communications without judicial authorization, surveillance without authorization, and embezzlement of state funds to purchase espionage equipment. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
In another landmark decision Thursday, the court held in McGirt v. [read post]
