Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2016, 1:09 pm
The post The SCOTUS recently addressed several issues that will impact blood alcohol testing in Pennsylvania Birchfield v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:01 am
See Jennings v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 3:53 pm
Heathfield wrote in changes on his 2004 will, essentially stating that Ms. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 7:06 am
State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:55 am
Though not a bike lighting case, the First District Appellate Court (Chicago is in the First District) considered this issue in Savage v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:43 am
The CAFC case Hollmer v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:10 am
North Carolina The United States Supreme Court is also considering the case of Brewington v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:54 am
This decision came after the recent Illinois Supreme Court ruling striking down part of the state's gun law as unconstitutional (People v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 7:35 am
Third, they rejected efforts to reconceptualise the existing rules of neutrality in light of the Covenant and the Pact. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 5:03 am
In Hamama v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
In Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
In Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
When is a Mass not a Mass? When it is Seven State Court Actions, Each with Less than 100 plaintiffs.
13 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Tanoh v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 6:24 am
The Ohio State University v. [read post]
30 Apr 2005, 11:07 am
At issue, then, is the continued vitality of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Whether Gentry remains good law or not may be gleaned from this opinion but it doesn’t appear likely it will be clearly stated. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Since that branch of petition which was to compel disclosure of certain records remains undetermined in light of [the Appellate Division's] determination," the Appellate Division held that "the [Plaintiff's] request for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs is premature (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d 731; see Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d at 828). [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Since that branch of petition which was to compel disclosure of certain records remains undetermined in light of [the Appellate Division's] determination," the Appellate Division held that "the [Plaintiff's] request for an award of attorney's fees and litigation costs is premature (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d 731; see Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d at 828). [read post]
