Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 2161 - 2180 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2016, 10:52 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiff’s claims under the California consumer protection statutes are governed by the “reasonable consumer” test. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court got rid of the New Jersey consumer protection law claims because NJ’s law doesn’t protect competitors, but did allow some claims under the Lanham Act and the New Jersey Fair Trade Act. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 10:15 am
Meanwhile, Apple and other tech companies are bolstering the security of their devices in response to consumer demand and the new threats to security cropping up every day. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am by Adam Levitin
 The Supreme Court is considering whether to hear an appeal in a critical consumer protection case called Midland Funding v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 121, 122-28 for the proposition: Of course, patent protection can also be challenged on ethical grounds, including notions of human rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.) [read post]
When consumers see a Nike shoe, for example, the Nike name, Swoosh logo, and “Just Do It” tag line tell consumers that the shoe doesn’t come from Adidas, New Balance, or any other manufacturer – it only comes from Nike. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:49 am by Ron Coleman
As Rebecca explained: The [McNeil Nutritionals, LLC v. [read post]