Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 9,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
Both Jon and Mike referenced the infamous exchange from United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Trump v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In the face of this traditional judicial lassitude, “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof” were all a litigant could hope to accomplish in litigation. [read post]
10 May 2020, 5:04 am
Cessar v Malta App. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:55 pm
Three year ago, I was in the Court for arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:43 am
In 2014, in a case called Burwell v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:10 am
These recent decisions continue a long line of case law—including the maligned yet ubiquitous United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:00 am
Challenges to COVID-19 Orders by houses of worship are not limited to the United States. [read post]
4 May 2020, 11:50 am
Lighthouse Fellowship Church v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:00 am
In a breach of non-compete action, this burden may not be met when economically unjustified restrictive provisions are “too broad as they would essentially prevent Defendant from operating … anywhere in the United States. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
