Search for: "United States v. Paul" Results 2161 - 2180 of 4,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2015, 8:20 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
Rumsfeld as his first Supreme Court case; the details of oral argument before the Supreme Court; understanding the importance of technical knowledge in understanding law, legal arguments and results; serving as Acting Solicitor General of the United States and how the Solicitor General’s office compares to private practice; and teaching law, clerking for Justice Stephen G. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:58 am
  My friends cut-and-paste allow a quick summary from the Eighth Circuit's official opinion page:062965P.pdf   05/18/2007  United States  v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The spectacle of, say, Justice John Paul Stevens (whom I much admired) serving for 34 years until he retired at the age of 90, is unknown not only abroad, but even more to the point, everywhere else in the United States (save, perhaps, Rhode Island). [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 8 conference) United States v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by Mike
 Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Such agreements are enforceable under the ADEA since the Act does not preclude arbitration of claims brought pursuant to the statute (April 1, 2009).Flores-Figueroa v United States. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
United States, that DOD has to obtain a court order in order to acquire, access, or use information, such as CAI, that is equally available for purchase to foreign adversaries, U.S. companies, and private persons as it is to the US Government. [read post]