Search for: "A M v. Review Board" Results 201 - 220 of 2,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney James M. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:20 am
The Board's review of this analysis shows a reasoned concern for applying the Douglas v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
Centocor sought [...] review under [§ 146] of the decisions of the [Board] in an interference between [Centocor's] U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:34 am by Alan Brackett
Saltchuk-Young Brothers, No. 17-70415 (March 4, 2019), the court affirmed a decision of the Benefits Review Board, which in turn had affirmed Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Richard M. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by Administrator
The Board unjustifiably defined the scope of the Project under review not to include Project-related tanker traffic. [read post]