Search for: "A v. X, Y, and Z" Results 201 - 220 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
.; (v) Aggravated robbery of controlled substances, in violation of section 18-4-303, C.R.S.; (x) Incest, in violation of section 18-6-301, C.R.S.; (y) Aggravated incest, in violation of section 18-6-302, C.R.S.; (z) Child abuse, in violation of section 18-6-401, C.R.S.; (aa) Sexual exploitation of children, in violation of section 18-6-403, C.R.S.; (bb) Crimes against at-risk adults or at-risk juveniles, in violation of section 18-6.5-103, C.R.S.; (cc) Any crime,… [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:06 pm by WIMS
The Subparts, which refer to specific industrial sectors and operations, covered by the final action include: A,C, D, E, F, G, H, K, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, Y, V, X, T, Z, AA, BB, CC, EE, FF, GG, HH, II, LL, MM, NN, OO, PP, and TT. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
            As to the PMA device, plaintiff’s only allegations were that defendant failed to comply with the CGMPs – general, open-ended, non-device specific regulations that state that the defendant should adopt some sort of process for doing X, Y, or Z. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:51 pm by Samuel Bray
One offers some assurance that her decision today on x will not be read as a decision tomorrow on y. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:28 pm by Michael Risch
They claim "The steps of making A happen by doing X, Y, and Z. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
,” where x, y, and z are various absorption measurements from the monitoring device (such as different wavelength readouts) and A, B, and C are coefficients that reflect the relative importance of the different measurements. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:00 am by Colby Pastre
Pieces of the Amount A Puzzle Profit Margin Z Deemed Routine Profits X Deemed Non-Routine Profits Y=Z-X and Y=W+V Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Markets W Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Other Factors V To achieve tax certainty and minimize negative economic consequences, it will be important for businesses to have clearly defined metrics that determine the “sustained and significant… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:03 pm by Ken Lammers
Then I always get dubious looks when I say, "Officers can do X, Y but not Z. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
X assigned the patent to Y, then Y to Z. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am by Peter Mahler
Thus, if the shareholder-petitioner seeking judicial dissolution of a corporation is a citizen of State X, the corporation is a citizen of State Y, and a named respondent shareholder is a citizen of State Z (or any state other than X), there is complete diversity of citizenship and the federal court has subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:46 am by Ilya Somin
" If it is unjust that some benefit or right is only available to Group X, but not Groups Y and Z, we can fix that by taking it away from X! [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm by maureen
  Riverside, CA  92506Telephone:  (951) = 781-1960 x 204  ? [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  DoJ didn’t pursue those claims b/c it wanted to test the waters on whether rep could say “we are studying the drug for X, Y, Z (unapproved) and our studies suggest that it works. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I get that argument for trademark registrations in general, but it seems weaker here, because ISU’s logo is the logo of an arm of state government, and I do think a government can reasonably say with its speech “we agree that X and Y are in-bounds, while Z is out-of-bounds. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:50 am by Bexis
  Claims that the FDA might have done something different encourage the jury to ignore what the FDA actually did, which we consider pernicious.Legal Opinions by Experts:  The court barred either side’s experts from offering opinions about what FDA regulations meant or about whether X, Y, or Z was “negligent” or “broke the law. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:00 am by Jonathan Holbrook
If an appellate opinion says that X is not a violation, but Y or Z probably would be, how much precedential weight does that carry in future cases involving Y or Z? [read post]