Search for: "AMES v. STRAIN" Results 201 - 220 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Chief Justice Rehnquist no doubt spoke for most judges and lawyers in expressing his discomfort with the notion that courts would have to actually look at science (rather than qualifications, demeanor, and credibility)[17]: “I defer to no one in my confidence in federal judges; but I am at a loss to know what is meant when it is said that the scientific status of a theory depends on its ‘falsifiability’, and I suspect some of them will be, too. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)*  * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)*  * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:47 pm
I am currently finishing my own book about the case and its aftermath: The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Therefore taking all above into consideration I am satisfied that the property was affordable for you. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Therefore taking all above into consideration I am satisfied that the property was affordable for you. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:25 am by azatty
” In it, the author is able to cover a variety of compelling and timely legal topics, all without straining your patience with massive length or endless footnoting. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:59 pm by Charon QC
This recent blog post is well worth a read:  Alan Turing: a strain’d quality of irrational and arbitrary mercy I must not overdo the ‘legal thinking’ or ‘thinking legal’ … back on the morrow with more. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
Indeed, the strain of critique that denies or rejects the importance of a sharp distinction between responsibility and duty makes it harder to critique the GP on its own terms. [read post]