Search for: "American Driver Service Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc.. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:15 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., March 25, 2015, U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 9:59 am
IMVU, Inc., 2014 WL 306842 (Cal. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
The employee in the case was a part-time driver for United Parcel Service of America, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:58 am
The plaintiff, Peggy Young, had worked as a part-time driver for United Parcel Service (“UPS”). [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:50 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:07 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc. was whether an employer must provide the same work accommodations to a pregnant employee as provided to similarly situated, non-pregnant employees. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
Similar to the revenue-generating apparatus in Ferguson, DeKalb County and for-profit Judicial Correction Services Inc. engage in a coercive debt collection scheme that focuses on making money at the expense of protecting poor people's constitutional rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, or F.S.I.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 7:24 am
Time will also reveal the unintended consequences of pressing self-driving cars into service on America’s roadways, if that ever happens. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Omega Flex, Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
As the squad car was following the bad driver plaintiffs came around a corner lawfully. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
Thomas, Inc v Lexington Insurance Co, stemmed from the stabbing of a truck driver during an altercation with a coworker in a dispute over a truck assignment. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Sometimes the employer accommodates similarly situated but non-pregnant workers because of the employer’s own policy (as in policies granting light-duty work for on-the-job injuries), sometimes because of an agreement with the union, and sometimes because of another legal mandate (as with the Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires reasonable accommodations for a broad range of disabilities, even temporary ones, but has been interpreted not to cover normal pregnancy). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:30 am
©2014 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 100 (Armendariz).)Slip op., at 34. [read post]
