Search for: "Automation & Electronics Inc"
Results 201 - 220
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Sirius XM Radio, Inc. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 3:02 am
See Trademark Rule 2.107(b); Hunt Control Systems Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
SAFEWAY INC., Dist. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
The ACS was the FBI’s Automated Case Support System; as this press release explains, in 2013 the FBI replaced the “paper-based” ACS System with a new digital system. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:15 pm
Innovative Investigations, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:47 am
[Mere descriptiveness refusal of ECAL for "automated systems, namely, micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of and self-calibrate equipment, namely, wheel balancers for balancing the wheels of land vehicles"].In re Gyroz, Inc., Serial No. 85551984 (September 12, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:03 am
Google Inc., 2013 WL 6987174 (S.D. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
Laredo prevents users from downloading or electronically capturing the documents they view. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:01 am
Ya–Ya Brand, Inc., 524 F.Supp.2d 1184 (C.D.Cal.2007), which found that § 1202(b) “was [not] intended to apply to circumstances that have no relation to the Internet, electronic commerce, automated copyright protections, or management systems, public registers, or other technological measures or processes as contemplated in the DMCA as a whole. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
NAUTILUS, INC., D. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:10 pm
Aereo, Inc. finally answered the question whether the start-up performed copyrighted works to the public. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:06 am
A universe of largely machine-readable legal documents would also be one in which it may be possible for third-parties to develop systems that automate and significantly streamline legal services. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:06 am
A universe of largely machine-readable legal documents would also be one in which it may be possible for third-parties to develop systems that automate and significantly streamline legal services. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Make-A-Tape In 1973, a court considered a chain of electronics stores operating “Make-A-Tape” machines.4 Customers could select an album from the store’s catalog, purchase one of the blank tapes sold by the store, conveniently receiving as change the two quarters required to operate the machine, and start the “Make-A-Tape. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Jan. 30, 2014) (“Actos”); In re Ethicon, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Google, Inc.: Does An Actor Have A Copyright Interest In His Or Her Performance In A Film? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
”14 The Second Circuit in YouTube and the Ninth Circuit in Shelter Capital read this language very broadly, finding that even transcoding and indexing user-submitted content to facilitate its public playback was protected by the safe harbor.15 While Section 512(c) protects a service provider for many automated acts that occur after a user uploads content to the service, the one thing it doesn’t provide immunity for is content supplied by the service provider itself. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Qualcomm Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
ASCAP[12] and Video Pipeline, Inc. v. [read post]
