Search for: "BES v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 68,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action was correct. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:55 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In A Health and Social Care Trust v A Mother Re (A Child) [2024] NIFam 4, SE, the child of a single mother, was placed in foster care by the Trust as a result of her mother’s mental state and drug misuse. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
On phone calls with one of the defendants, the claimant had repeatedly made threats of violence, without realising that the calls were being recorded. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Rahimi’s lawyers say a Supreme Court decision two years ago in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
  The harm that children suffer from seeing, hearing, being exposed or subjected to domestic abuse and coercive and controlling behaviour is now well established. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
Oklahoma,” which is now being briefed for argument in the fall. [read post]