Search for: "BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY" Results 201 - 220 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
”  Being liable for purported defects in a competing product means, of course, that the costs of such liability can only be recouped by charging ones own customers more for other, non-defective products, but there are more plaintiff lawyers than innovator drug companies in Alabama. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:53 am by Tom Lamb
That is, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer do not state in these advertisements that there is no FDA-approved antidote for Eliquis as regards its blood-thinner effect at this time. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
TAP Pharmaceuticals (Bristol Myers Squibb Appeal), No. 85 MAP 2011, slip op. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:41 am by Jason Rantanen
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
I accept that, for the reasons explained by Jacob J in Bristol-Myers Squibb and Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen, courts should be cautious before relying upon prosecution history as an aid to construction. [read post]
1 May 2014, 1:29 am by Ben Vernia
The government had investigated and settled other allegations, but the settlement specifically reserved the relator’s right to pursue certain off-label promotion and kickback charges against Bristol-Myers Squibb for three drugs. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:02 pm
The individual filed suit in Cook County Circuit Court against Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Sanofi-Aventis US Inc., and Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. in a claim of strict product liability, manufacturing defect, negligence, and failure to warn. [read post]