Search for: "Barber v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
– 5:05 P.M.SESSION V (with coffee break 3:30-3:50)NYS CLE Credit: 2.0, Areas of Professional PracticeCommentators on proposals presented, and Q&A PeriodJane Ginsburg, ModeratorMorton L. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
" United States Parole Comm'n v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:42 am
AB 5 codifies the “ABC” test for employee status adopted by the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
To assist with that decision the Court examines two earlier cases on this point.The first is Cardiff City Council v Stone [2003] EWCA Civ 298. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:17 pm
In today’s case (Firman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 4:13 am
at 2372 (citing Zauderer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:16 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Barrie Barber of the Saginaw News has the story. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:07 am
., daycare centers and barber shops). [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 8:29 pm
Barber Memorial Shelter, Inc. v Town of North Wilkesboro Board of Adjustment of the Town of North Wilkesboro, 576 F. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
The article merely stated that “questions were raised” about her due diligence. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:31 am
MUNROE v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
Wade Should Have Said (2005)Sotirios Barber and James E. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
 The issue in Barber, et al., v. [read post]
