Search for: "Best Products, Inc. v. Best Products Co., Inc" Results 201 - 220 of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2018, 8:22 am by Larry
I just know to a legal certainty that they are not human and I don't want my kid marrying one.I know this because the Court of International Trade told me so in Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 57. [19] The claims are not limited to the “best mode,” often called the “preferred embodiment,” described in the specification or illustrated in the drawings: Bombardier Recreational Products Inc v Arctic Cat, Inc, 2018 FCA 172 at paragraph 54. [20] See Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Co v Teva Canada Limited, 2016 FC 580 at paragraph 335. [21] That presumption was colourfully… [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Race to the Bottom
Howey Co., proposed requiring some form of post-sale obligation to form an investment contract. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by war
Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1299 [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The individual defendants Donald Barrett and Robert Maihos co-own ITV Direct, Inc. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
Although the defendants did not sell their product until 2016, they claimed in advertisements that their product was ranked “Best Product and Number 1” in 2015. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:50 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  A number of respondents were terminated from the investigation and the remaining respondents are MVTec Software GmbH and MVTec LLC, Omron Corporation, Resolution Technology, Inc., Visics Corp., Daiichi Jitsugyo Viswill Co., Ltd., and Daiichi Jitsugyo (America), Inc. [read post]