Search for: "Brown v. Rogers"
Results 201 - 220
of 514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484 [1st Dept 2015]; Matter of Brown v City of New York, 111 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm
Both sides were represented by experienced specialist costs counsel (Mr Andrew Post and Mr Simon P Browne). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
Martin Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0669n.06 Roger Estill v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
See Rogers v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 9:52 pm
Everyone knows Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote Dred Scott. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:33 am
’” Rotenberg said as Congress considers cybersecurity proposals, “the decision in EPIC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
As Judge Brown points out, Justice Story acknowledged the importance of deference to Congress in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:42 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown in Hettinga v. [read post]
4 Dec 0001, 4:00 pm
City Attorney Penman stated that under the Brown Act, public comments can be heard any time of the day. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
City Attorney Penman stated that under the Brown Act, public comments can be heard any time of the day. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
IRAP v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am
” In an op-ed for the Houston Chronicle, Sharon Browne and Roger Clegg urge the Court to grant cert. in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:52 pm
Circuit decision in Al Bihani v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
In an opinion for the court by the very conservative Judge Janice Rogers Brown (joined in full by Obama-appointed Circuit Judges Sri Srinivasan and Cornelia Pillard), the D.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
One hopes that, sixty-two years after Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
In 1956, Ervin helped draft the Southern Manifesto denouncing Brown v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:38 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown, writing for the Court, acknowledged that while federal courts typically defer to agency interpretations of enabling statutes, they do so when the statutory provision is ambiguous and the agency’s interpretation is reasonable. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
In this context, the most important test of the judicial restraint that flowed from the New Deal came, of course, in Brown v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
