Search for: "Brown v. State Merit System"
Results 201 - 220
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States, 15-6418, immediately found itself Dancing with the Big Boys on the Court’s merits docket. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Fifth Circuit United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:43 pm
The new legislation also requires employers to affirmatively demonstrate that a wage differential is based entirely and reasonably upon enumerated factors, such as a seniority system, a merit system, a system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production, or a bona fide factor that is not based on or derived from a sex-based differential in compensation and that is consistent with a business necessity. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:58 am
SB 358 (enrolled and presented to the Governor September 15) would prohibit an employer from paying any employee at a wage rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for doing substantially similar work—when viewed as a composite of skill, effort, and responsibility—and require the employer to affirmatively demonstrate that a wage differential is based entirely and reasonably upon one or more enumerated factors, such as a seniority system, a merit… [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
A judicial system in which there are such delays requires reformation. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:55 pm
On Friday, in Arpaio v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
OPINION ADA BROWN, Justice. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
OPINION ADA BROWN, Justice. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:36 am
Russell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Does an arbitrator exceed his or her power when passing on the merits of the constitutional argument? [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
System, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:21 am
MacALISTER, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:22 am
Accordingly, it reversed the judgment of the state appeals court, which had affirmed judgment on the jury’s $1 million verdict in her favor (San Antonio Water System v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
And even if the cause of action was time-barred, would the court then still have authority to so rule on the merits? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Leach Builders, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
