Search for: "Bryant v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” In March 1783, the US Continental Congress appointed a committee to “consider the most proper means of cherishing genius and useful arts through the United States by securing to authors or publishers of new books their property in such works. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:06 pm
Office of Personnel Management, Judge Vanessa Bryant of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut found Section 3 of DOMA to violate equal protection. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:50 am
“[Section 3 of DOMA] therefore violates the equal protection principles incorporated in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution,” wrote Judge Bryant. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
The term “Alford plea” originated with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:31 pm
Slip op., pg. 4 (citing State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
This was - and is - the promise of the Confrontation Clause.For the last several years, the Supreme Court of the United States has reflected upon the meaning of confrontation without much resolution. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:35 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:40 am
She believes that the bill is an attempt to ban abortions without directly challenging the 1973 United States Supreme Court decision of Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., ACands, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:29 pm
Canada is also reviewing structure/function claims food companies have submitted by developing a list of approved claims; it too has rejected most claims, including some found on labels in the United States, according to a Canadian official. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
Lane Bryant, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Bryant & Alexander A. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
United States Federal Highway Administration (sacred sites)Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:18 pm
But were a court to hold that Google’s algorithms “know” my emails the way a human employee would—and, accordingly, that I no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy under United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
