Search for: "C. R.C. C."
Results 201 - 220
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 5:08 pm
Since R.C. 3319.081(C) makes Stewart a for-cause employee, Stewart argues he is entitled to such a hearing. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
R.C. 1345.01 (C) (A supplier is defined as a “seller, lessor, assignor, franchisor, or other person engaged in the business of effecting or soliciting consumer transactions, whether or not the person deals directly with the consumer. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:37 am
An entity that services a residential mortgage loan is not a “supplier” as defined in R.C. 1345.01(C).) [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:48 am
” R.C. 2907.05(C)(2)(a). [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm
R.C., involved the biological parents of a fourteen (14) year old boy each seeking to be designated as the parent of primary residence approximately ten (10) years after entering into a consent order resolving all issues of custody between them. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 10:25 am
The plaintiff relied on part (C) of the statute, which provides for a rebuttable presumption of intent to injure if the employer deliberately removes an equipment safety guard. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Justice Lanzinger concurred in judgment only, but also joined in Justice Pfeifer’s dissent that R.C. 2745.01(C) should be interpreted to protect both operators and non-operators of equipment. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
First Principle of Workers’ Compensation To be compensable, pursuant to R.C. 4123.01(C), an injury must have occurred “in the course of, and arising out of, the injured employee’s employment. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
R.C. 5747.24(C)(failure to file the appropriate statement with the Ohio Tax Commissioner creates a rebuttable presumption that a person is domiciled in Ohio for tax purposes) Sturgeon v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
Key Statute and Precedent R.C. 2711.10 (Bases on which a court of common pleas shall vacate an arbitration award.) [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
Majority Conclusion “R.C. 4112.01(A)(2) and 4112.02(A) do not expressly impose civil liability on political-subdivision employees so as to trigger the immunity exception in R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(c). [read post]
What Happened on Remand: M.H. v. Cuyahoga Falls. No Recovery for Plaintiff in Diving Board Accident.
19 Aug 2014, 8:13 am
R.C. 2744.01(C)(2)(u)(4) The design, maintenance, and operation of a municipal swimming pool are governmental functions. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:21 am
Pertinent Precedent R.C. 2945.71(C)(2) A defendant charged with a felony shall be brought to trial within two hundred seventy days after the person’s arrest. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:26 pm
Ohio R.C. 2943.032. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:32 pm
Case Syllabus Unvested military retirement benefits earned during marriage fall within the definition of marital property in R.C. 3105.171(A)(3)(a) and must be considered for division under R.C. 3105.171(C). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:31 am
All of the allegations in the complaint except the one alleging deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard under R.C. 2745.01(C) were lodged against both Cole and Precision. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am
The ten year tax abatement in R.C. 5709.87 has been on the books for twenty years. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
Pertinent to this appeal is Hoyle’s claim brought pursuant to R.C. 2745.01(C), the section of the intentional tort statute dealing with deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
Among his allegations was that, pursuant to R.C. 2745.01(C), an “equipment safety guard” had been deliberately removed by his employer. [read post]
