Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. CHANCELLOR" Results 201 - 220 of 2,428
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 3:00 am by Meredith Ervine
In a recent opinion in New Enterprise Associates 14, L.P. v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:30 am
Claims That SPAC Directors, Sponsors Breached Fiduciary Duties Survive Motions to Dismiss in Pair of Opinions In two opinions by Vice Chancellor Will, Delman v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:30 am
Claims That SPAC Directors, Sponsors Breached Fiduciary Duties Survive Motions to Dismiss in Pair of Opinions In two opinions by Vice Chancellor Will, Delman v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
After reviewing the objections, the Chancellor noted (emphasis added): “[50]. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Parliamentarians, including former Brexit Secretary David Davis, former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and Green MP Caroline Lucas and human rights organisations have called on the retail group owned by Mike Ashley to stop using facial recognition surveillance in their stores. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Like the Convocation House and the Divinity School, the University Chancellor’s Court is licensed [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 3:15 am by John Jenkins
The Delaware Chancery Court’s recent decision in Hyde Park Venture Partners Fund III, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
We found official statements condemning Dobbs made last year by many Chancellors and deans around the country particularly curious insofar as these statements purported to assert institutional positions on the legal correctness of a constitutional case even though the authors of the statements seemed to have no grounding in constitutional law. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 7:09 am by Emma Kent
Recently, the impact of the coronavirus pandemic and whether it could amount to a Barder event (HW v WW [2021]) or not (BT v CU [2021]) has been a feature of reported caselaw. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 7:43 pm by Francis Pileggi
Corporate counsel could profit from reading the vice chancellor’s review of those exceptions and the opinions he cited as the foundation for that March 9 decision. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
The Chancellor was satisfied that the scheme would benefit the College and would help it towards reaching its net zero target. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
The decision provides some certainty to multi-class companies that are seeking to adopt these amendments and avoids opening the kind of can of worms with respect to prior charter amendments that many SPACs have had to deal with as a result of Vice Chancellor Zurn’s decision in Garfield v. [read post]