Search for: "Cable v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, 21 F.4th 535, 542 (9th Cir. 2021) (held that the injunction sought was "public" rather than private) Stover v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:06 am
The findings of the Comptroller’s audit and investigation were referred to Dutchess County District Attorney William V. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 11:05 pm
However, on August 25, 2008, in Cable Connection, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:12 am
However, on August 25, 2008, in Cable Connection, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 8:35 am
Additional Resources: Portland Commissioner Amanda Fritz Receives $1.45 Million From State for Husband’s Death, Dec. 8, 2015, By Aimee Green, The Oregonian More Blog Entries: Griffin v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:33 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faidi & Anor v Elliot Corporation [2012] EWCA Civ 287 (16 March 2012) HK (Afghanistan) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 315 (16 March 2012) Yafai v Muthana [2012] EWCA Civ 289 (16 March 2012) McGuire v Rose [2012] EWCA Civ 288 (16 March 2012) Welsh Ministers & Anor v RWE Npower Renewables Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 311 (15 March 2012) Smith v Butler [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
I’ve been following American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
A familiar sight for lawyersinvolved in TVCatchup suitsITV Broadcasting Limited, ITV 2 Limited, ITV Digital Channels Limited, Channel Four Television Corporation, 4 Ventures Limited, Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited and ITV Studios Limited v TVCatchup Limited (in administration), TVCatchup (UK) Limited and Media Resources Limited (a Mauritian company) [2015] EWCA Civ 204 is the latest development in the long-running copyright litigation saga which is usually known by its shorter name of ITV… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
Oral argument in Horne v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:46 am
Custom Media Technologies LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am
Both Courts focused on the language of Section 111 which defines a cable system as follows: A “cable system” is a facility, located in any State, territory, trust territory, or possession of the United States, that in whole or in part receives signals transmitted or programs broadcast by one or more television broadcast stations licensed by the Federal Communications Commission, and makes secondary transmissions of such signals or programs by wires,… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
The Court’s decision in National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:32 am
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission v. [read post]
Cable splicers’ class claim that efficiency pressure forced them to work off-the-clock decertified
23 Dec 2013, 6:43 am
When the cable splicer is confined to a job site during lunch, the CBA states that the cable splicer “will be permitted reasonable paid time to eat on the job. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:13 am
Knowles v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:10 am
Second, the EIA standard states the appropriate spacing used between open-top cable supports. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
As the relevant regulation noted: (G) In the case of a communication appearing exclusively on a cable or satellite television system, but not on a broadcast station or network, that the viewership of the cable system or satellite system lying within a Congressional district or State is 50,000 or more; 11 CFR §100.29(b)(7)(i)(G). [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:55 am
In Universal Cable Productions LLC, et al. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 5:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
