Search for: "California v. American Stores Co" Results 201 - 220 of 343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Steven’s recent publications include: “Digital Evidence as Hearsay”, Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review (October 2009) Volume 6, The HIPAA Technology Challenge: Protecting the Integrity of Health Care Information, California Health Law News – Volume XXVI, Issue 1, Winter 2007/2008; Spoliation in the Digital Universe, The SciTech Lawyer, Science and Technology Law Section of the American Bar Association, Fall 2007; Life After Sarbanes-Oxley… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:27 am by Andrew Trask
American Honda Co., which held that plaintiffs could not file nationwide class actions based solely on California law. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Roy Ginsburg
This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.] [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:44 pm by Venkat
California Constitution: The California Constitution protects against privacy intrusions by both public and private actors. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
 On the face of it, Plavix's patent expiry may have arguably paved the way for Eli Lilly & Co's and AstraZeneca's own blood-thinning drugs, Effient and Brilinta respectively, to gain more market share but the expiry of the patent does not mean that increasing the market share of their competitor drugs will be easy. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  In 2000, to be named CEO of GE… well, you might as well have been named King of American Conglomerate-land. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
An employer who accesses any information that is password protected or otherwise not available to the public without the authorization of the potential employee will be subject to liability under the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which prohibits intentionally accessing or exceeding authorization to access a facility in which an electronic communication is provided and thereby obtaining access to an electronic communication stored in the system. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
Not even for those Americans whose suffering is unequivocally shown to be relieved by marijuana. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm by Robin E. Shea
A man was arrested at a Carlisle, Pennsylvania Walmart for eating some of the store' [read post]