Search for: "California v. United States Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 201 - 220
of 556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
The appellate court rejected this argument as well, saying nothing in the program EIR requirements compelled later environmental review and stated that the requirement for later environmental review would be a function of the thoroughness of the initial program document. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:57 am
The rule will help to ensure that the EPA has the information it needs to track asbestos use and to protect workers and the public from asbestos exposure.Asbestos Fiber and Causal RelationshipAsbestos, a known carcinogen cancer-causing agent, still is not banned in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm
Black sites and state secrets In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
United States Forest Service, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule[25] requiring facilities that emit more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent to report their direct GHG emissions.[26] About 8,000 facilities are required to report.[27] This rule also requires fuel suppliers to report the emissions attributable to the fu [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 12:23 pm
In Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Environmental Protection Agency intended to consolidate preconstruction and Title V permitting requirements. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:01 pm
Walker More than three years after the State’s initial request, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“US EPA”) granted California’s request for a waiver to allow the state to enforce its greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emission standards for new motor vehicles. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:58 pm
Today the Environmental Protection Agency issued rules to curb carbon pollution from big power plants and other big polluters under the Clean Air Act, while at the same time assuring millions of small businesses – from mom and pop operations, to farms, to mid-sized manufacturing concerns – that they have nothing to worry about. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
The National Environmental Protection Act requires federal agencies to perform detailed studies into the environmental impacts of federal infrastructure projects before construction on the project may begin. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:06 pm
(LA Neighbors United v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 20-1531Issue: Whether 42 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm
” (Citing California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm
But California's position was greatly strengthened by the Supreme Court's May 2018 ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
" But even if they were compelled, he adequately waived his Garrityprotections, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:20 pm
Following California Supreme Court and its own case law precedent, the Second District, Division Five, has ruled in Guerrero et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
On June 23, 2021, the United States Supreme Court held in a 6-3 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
On June 23, 2021, the United States Supreme Court held in a 6-3 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
El Dorado County Water Agency (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 931, 962-965 [NOE filed for resolution authorizing agency to negotiate to purchase a water project preceded by 5 months agency’s project “approval” through taking actual steps to purchase]; Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
Environmental Protection Agency.) [read post]
