Search for: "Case v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 201 - 220 of 747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm by Joe
Cannabis companies need to avoid problems with the Internal Revenue Service, otherwise they will be in for a great deal of stress. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 Jun 2019. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 Jun 2019. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:30 am by Michael Yu
The professors discuss how an SMLLC “can be used to blunt the negative effects” (P. 325) (arguably, more successfully than an FLP) as to Internal Revenue Code sections 2512, 1015, and 2036, in part because of a Tax Court case, Pierre v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Fairness Commissioner confirms that the number of internationally trained lawyers has risen from 7% in 2005, to over a third of all candidates in 2018. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 Jun 2019. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by skelly
Not only may a surplus lines insurance broker be forced to request a tax refund from the “master policy” home state taxing authority (usually the state insurance department or surplus lines insurance “stamping office”, but, in some cases, the state department of revenue), but if another state has a higher surplus lines insurance premium tax rate, the broker may need to make up the difference out of its own pockets or otherwise attempt to extract further tax… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J handed down a judgment in the case of Birmingham City Council v Afsar. [read post]
10 May 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Internal Investigations: The Consequences of Government “Outsourcing” The SDNY attracted quite a bit of attention last week with Judge McMahon’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:30 am by Bill Purdy
Love letter from the IRS The “why” is found in Internal Revenue Service INFO 2002-0024 (released 3/29/2002). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
According to the Internal Revenue Service, for those who received a refund this year that refund averaged to about $3,000 per person. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm by opseo
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has additional information on this matter you can review via publication p4681. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:34 am by Anthony Fairclough
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors, heard 3-4 Dec 2018. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 8:43 pm by Nassiri Law
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in which Ginbsurg successfully argued that a $600 caregiver tax credit shouldn’t be denied to a man solely on that basis. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
The SOCAN v CAIP case was followed in the Internet copyright case, Davydiuk v Internet Archive Canada, 2014 FC 944, and in a competition case, Desjean v Intermix Media, Inc, 2006 FC aff’d 2007 FCA 365. [read post]