Search for: "Cass v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am by Tom Goldstein
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:49 pm by Terry Hart
Cass and Hylton explain that IP protection, including copyright, comes with static costs, but it produces dynamic benefits. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At Bloomberg View, Cass Sunstein discusses the historic significance of the amicus brief that the federal government filed last week in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
  The cases they discuss are the Massachusetts and California cases finding a right to same sex marriage (as well as the legislative arguments made successfully to support New York’s Marriage Equality Act); another is the Lawrence v Texas, which they argue validated intimacy, whether homosexual or heterosexual, as both a moral good and a protected choice. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
As most readers are probably aware, the past few years have seen considerable media and clinical interest in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a progressive, neurodegenerative condition linked to, and thought to result from, concussions, blasts, and other forms of brain injury (including, importantly, repeated but milder sub-concussion-level injuries) that can lead to a variety of mood and cognitive disorders, including depression, suicidality, memory loss, dementia,… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Cass, Cass & Associates (June 25)   Presidential campaign documents seldom read like carefully crafted scholarly work. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
Reis, Judge.The State appeals from an order obtained by producers of films that registered for state tax credits directing that the films’ final budget summaries be kept confidential. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:30 pm by Andrew K. Woods
First, I’m not sure that 3pp v. 2pp perfectly captures the “retributive v. consequentialist” divide. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm by INFORRM
  It probably only reflects the position as it would have been found to exist at common law (see Vassiliev v Frank Cass & Co Ltd [2003] EWHC 1428 (QB) – in which qualified privilege was found partly on the basis of the journal having an “exclusive readership”). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am by Sandy Levinson
You don't have to articulate an administerable standard any more than you did in Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by Marissa Miller
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]