Search for: "Chancellor v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 1,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
A tenured employee who resigns from his or her position and is subsequently reemployed by his or her former employer in the same title is not automatically entitled to tenure in the positionSpringer v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 5:20 am by Carl Neff
 Chancellor Bouchard stated that such credible basis may be established through “documents, logic, and testimony”. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
The leading case addressing this issue: Delaware State College v Ricks, 449 US 250. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rogers v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1459 (15 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683 (16 June 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Culkin v The Wirral Independent Appeals Panel [2011] EWHC 1526 (QB) (15 June 2011) Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB) (16 June 2011) High Court (Family Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P… [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:49 am by grosin
Proposed legislation has been working its way through the Delaware State Bar Association. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
Hasen is Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Irvine. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:46 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ahmed, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1949 (29 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Raggett v Society of Jesus Trust of 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1002 (27 August 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer Plc [2010] EWHC 2215 (Ch) (27 August 2010) High Court (Family Division) Re P [2010] EWHC 1592 (Fam) (13 May 2010) A Local Authority v A & Anor [2010]… [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Court grants review of two cases, likely to be among the term’s more important for business, to clarify the limits of state court personal jurisdiction when none of defendants’ actions relevant to the dispute took place in the state [Jim Beck on Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]