Search for: "Clark v. Wells" Results 201 - 220 of 1,833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In Westminster CC v Clarke (1992) 2 AC 288 (a hostel for the homeless), exclusive possession was found to be inconsistent with the purposes for which the Council provided the accommodation. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
And complaints have been filed against Jeffrey Clark and John Eastman, alleging violations of lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
  From Judge Stephen Clark's opinion in Steak N Shake, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am by Jonathan Shaub
And there is no doubt Meadows, Scavino, Patel, and others, like Trump’s Justice Department ally Jeffrey Clark, are watching carefully what happens with Bannon—who, unlike the other three, was not a government employee during the time at issue. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Riana Harvey
Well, such a case arose before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) recently, in one of the most unique contexts to date.As succinctly and aptly described by HHJ Clarke in her opening paragraph: “This [was] a dispute between two spiritual and holistic therapists over use of the trade mark ‘ARCHANGEL ALCHEMY’ to sell metaphysical/spiritual education and coaching courses which aim to connect participants with archangels”.Need more be said? [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Doctor Rachel Clarke reported the tweet to the police and has threatened to sue Moran for defamation. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:19 am by Bob Ambrogi
  The collection consists of more than 90,000 cases involving violations of Titles II, III and V of the ADA, as well as claims under disability rights laws in states that Lex Machina covers. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]