Search for: "Coke v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2014, 3:42 pm
Pusateri v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:56 pm
Pusateri v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
State agencies, including those in Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, have all reported to the U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm
For example, in Kraft Foods Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
It lays down the fundamental structure and essential values of the state. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 4:02 am
The Tito’s lawsuit (Hoffman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
From the Kentucky Supreme Court, in Sevier v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
Chief Justice Coke is uncomfortable in his crypt.Justice Coke ain't the only one. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:22 pm
” Just last year, in City of Arlington v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
In Clark v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 11:20 am
The EPA’s stated reason for amending the petroleum refinery emission standards was to address the risk remaining after application of the standards promulgated in 1995 and 2002. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Interestingly, Much of the argument concerned a 2009 ruling, Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
But Monday’s argument in POM Wonderful v. [read post]