Search for: "Com. v. Long, R."
Results 201 - 220
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
Although other Draft Guidelines reference the familiar Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (“HHI”), economists have long criticized the use of HHI in partial acquisition or common ownership situations. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
The rupture was a long time coming. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
“[R]egulation cannot, in a liberal democracy, force viewers to consumer media products they do not think they want in the name of the public interest,” argues Goodman.[16] (This dilemma creates additional practical problems for proposals to expand public interest regulation, which will be discussed in Sec. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm
It is fun because it’s a long litany of all the mistakes they made in their opinion. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Three weeks after admission, as of the reporting date, the child remained on dialysis and had unknown neurological consequences.This fits with a reported pattern of approximately 8 days for incubation of O104:H4 [1], about twice as long as for O157:H7. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm
2 0 24 A N N U A L R E P O R T— E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y 13K E Y F I N D I N G S Freedom of Expression■ This reporting year, the People's Republic of China(PRC) continued to restrict online and in-personexpression, censoring various forms of artistic, literary,historical, and entertainment content, in violation ofthe International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR), the Universal Declaration of Human Rights(UDHR), and… [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
Unfortunately, the core of Evergreen contains a very bizarre interpretation of the Medical Marijuana Program Act which, I suspect, means that Evergreen will not long be a citable case. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am
A closer look While Schmitz reveled in the attention, it wasn’t long before TÜV was wondering what, exactly, it had bought. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
But many states operate under statutory schemes, or common law schemes bounded by statute, that limit full application of strict liability to manufacturers.12 For example, the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) applies strict liability to manufacturers but leaves non-manufacturing sellers liable only for negligence.13 Other states employ “pass through” statutes that limit the liability of sellers who do not exercise control over a product, so long as the seller can… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
But many states operate under statutory schemes, or common law schemes bounded by statute, that limit full application of strict liability to manufacturers.12 For example, the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) applies strict liability to manufacturers but leaves non-manufacturing sellers liable only for negligence.13 Other states employ “pass through” statutes that limit the liability of sellers who do not exercise control over a product, so long as the seller can… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
You’re going to go to, trumptaxreformtalk.eventbrite, that’s E‑V‑E‑N‑T‑B‑R‑I‑T‑E, .com. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm
See generally Ferens v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Essentially, the European litigation system is based on mutual trust which relies on the expectation that the courts of all Member States will apply European law in the same way and respect fundamental rights of the parties to the same extent.14 In the near future, judgments coming from other Member States shall be recognised and enforced without any further review.15 Within the European Judicial Area, litigation and arbitration are considered as two equal alternatives of dispute resolution.16… [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
” Roadcap v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am
Courts and the PTO have long recognized the lack of trademark significance of a .com, and the court's conclusion seems to presume that Forchion's use of a dot com for his personal name would somehow be the basis for confusion. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
The plaintiffs presented an expert witness, Barry R. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
