Search for: "Commerce International Company, Inc. v. the United States" Results 201 - 220 of 496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 6:25 pm by Larry
United States International Trade Commission. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Penguin Books USA, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am by INFORRM
John Hanke, CEO of Niantic, Inc (the software development company that brought us Pokémon Go) Brian Mullins, Co-Founder & CEO of DAQRI (tech company focused on empowering people in their everyday lives through AR) Stanley Pierre-Louis, General Counsel of the Entertainment Software Association (the U.S. association representing companies that publish computer and video games) U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am by Trey Childress
Plaintiffs alleged that defendants, two Chinese companies, participated in a cartel to fix the price of vitamin C exported to the United States in violation of U.S. antitrust law. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
In RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
”  [14][1]          United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
As found by the Federal Court in  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am by Barry Sookman
In one of my prior blog posts, TPP, copyright, e-commerce and digital policy: a reply to Michael Geist, I showed that he criticized the TPP’s intellectual property and e-commerce chapters by incorrectly or misleadingly describing them, using exaggeration, and basing his criticisms on unreasonable or inapt expectations for a trade deal. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Cyber-attacks involving the theft of intellectual property can result in a company’s immediate or even permanent loss of revenue and reputation; cyber-attacks involving denial of services (such as a website being shut down by nefarious hackers) can disrupt or forever diminish consumer or customer confidence; cyber-attacks involving exfiltration of private company emails can have a tumultuous impact upon senior management and create an international uproar;… [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am by Barry Sookman
Slater decided that his future lay in emigrating to the United States, he faced such draconian trade-secrets laws in his native Britain (which tried to enforce them in a failed attempt to prevent new technology from arriving to the United States) that he had to keep his travel plans secret from family and friends, and disguise himself as a farm labourer. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]