Search for: "Concepcion v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm by Steven Berk
No arguments were heard and the decision boils down to: “The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm by Steven Berk
No arguments were heard and the decision boils down to: “The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm by Steven Berk
No arguments were heard and the decision boils down to: “The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Supreme Court precedent, the unanimous panel concluded as follows: “Although we agree with Truly Nolen that Concepcion implicitly disapproved the reasoning of the Gentry court, the United States Supreme Court did not directly address the precise issue presented in Gentry. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
The case is yet another example where an appellate court considered the impact of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision in Concepcion v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:59 pm by Art Hinshaw
The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:03 pm by Brian Wolfman
The following excerpt summarizes Stone's findings: [T]the eighteen cases are, in chronological order, United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 4:55 pm by Jeff Sovern
The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:00 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Daily Journal ran a front page article today noting the confused state of California law on mandatory arbitration and class action waivers after Concepcion. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:14 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The opinion, certified for partial publication, noted that “the United States Supreme Court in Concepcion did not eliminate state law unconscionability as a defense to the enforcement of arbitration agreements subject to the Federal Arbitration Act” (slip op. at 7), with a bulky string citation to multiple precedents also holding that Concepcion did not nullify California’s unconscionability doctrine as applied to contracts purporting to… [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm by Dan Markel
, by Kyle Graham A Pronouncing Dictionary of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Sally Pei et al. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolAnother California case has compelled the arbitration of a wage and hour claim in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by Andrew Trask
National Australia Bank Ltd., which held that a securities plaintiff with no connection to the United States may not avail itself of the U.S. court system; and Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Moreover, the United States Supreme Court in Concepcion did not eliminate state law unconscionability as a defense to the enforcement of arbitration agreements subject to the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]