Search for: "Corporation of America v. Marks" Results 201 - 220 of 727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm by John L. Welch
AFP Imaging Corporation, 101 USPQ2d 1188 (TTAB 2011) [precedential]. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O)    Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat)   Global -… [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted).A permanent injunction is an equitable remedy.Weinberger v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am by John L. Welch
., Serial No. 77219184 [Refusal to register the mark depicted below, consisted of "the configuration of interlaced woven strips of leather forming a repeating weave pattern used over all or substantially all of the goods," for wallets, purses, and other leather goods, on the grounds of aesthetic and utilitarian functionality, mere ornamentality, and lack of acquired distinctiveness].October 5, 2011 - 2 PM: Companhia de Bebidas das Americas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
KG v President of Gernamn Patent- und Markenamt (IPKat) Geobra Brandstätter assert copyright against vicar Pfarrer Markus Bomhard for using ‘deformed’ Playmobil figurines to depict biblical scenes (IPKat) (The IP Factor) Bundesgerichtshof on when a trade mark is distinctive enough to qualify for registration: STREETBALL case (Class 46) Still no infringement of Tuc cracker shape, says German appellate court (Class 46)   Greece Well-known MOUYER… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
(Patently-O) CAFC decides inter partes patent reexamination in favor of patentee: Vanguard Identification Systems Inc., v Bank of America Corporation (Docket Report) CAFC: ‘The specification is the heart of the patent’: Arlington Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am by SHG
  Lives are for only good for practice, before letting baby biglawyers work on important cases for corporations. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:30 am by James Kachmar
MCA Records, Inc.), a hip hop record label (20th Century Fox Television v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
Allegiance Corporation (TTABlog) Another restaurant name dispute – District Court S D New York: Nothing Heavy, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 US corporations exercise their rights under the treaty in Latin America all the time; drafters expected that b/c of US dominance. [read post]