Search for: "Curry v. Curry" Results 201 - 220 of 573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 5:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To state a claim for fraudulent inducement, a plaintiff must show that the defendant’s misrepresentation or concealment induced the plaintiff to enter into the transaction and directly caused the plaintiff to suffer a loss (Meyercord v Curry, 38 AD3d 315, 316 [1st Dept 2007]). [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Curry favour with Donald Trump'” by granting trade mark rights… seriously? [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:27 pm
In 1999 the supreme court of Canada outlined the circumstances when an employer would (and would not) be held vicariously liable for sexual abuse by an employee: Bazley v Curry and Jacobi v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:34 am by Steve Hall
Loper says the judge wants to give the state and the defense in State v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 7:14 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Curry, 977 F.2d 1042, 1052 (7th Cir.1992) (“the district court's decision to exclude Dr. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canadian Family Law has progressed since the days of Currie v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Discussing the plagiarism matter related to Del Castillo and the Philippine Supreme Court, Raul V. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 3:28 am
Unearned fees may be recovered in a malpractice action, and "plaintiff's damages may include 'litigation expenses incurred in an attempt to avoid, minimize, or reduce the damage caused by the attorney's wrongful conduct'" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 443, quoting DePinto v Rosenthal & Curry, 237 AD2d 482, 482 [1997]; see 3 Mallen and Smith, Legal Malpractice § 21:6 [2008]). [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 11:43 am
Here, accepting the allegations of the complaint as true, they do not allege conduct so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to state a cause of action for negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress (see Curry v Dollard, 52 AD3d 642). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]