Search for: "DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED."
Results 201 - 220
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
And also, doing full write-ups on fewer cases so that we can do, you know, paying work. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:45 pm
Multi-district litigation (“MDL”), the process by which large numbers of smaller lawsuits are consolidated before a single judge for pretrial purposes, without requiring any kind of certification process, has been around since 1968. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The Circuit Court remanded the action to the district court to reconsider this and a number of other issues. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
They vote to take the case, or as Supreme Court aficionados say, to “grant cert” (short for the writ of certiorari), which places the case on the Court’s docket. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:49 am
Circuit remanded the case for dismissal, saying that plaintiffs failed to satisfy article III standing in the first instance. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 7:22 am
The good Prof. has been right before: here’s hoping his prediction is off the mark, this time. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Most recently, it has been rescheduled, but only after it was considered at Conference (cases are ordinarily rescheduled before Conference – see?). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
If you’re thinking that the caption of next week’s case sounds familiar, then you’ve been paying attention to the Court’s docket. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 8:54 am
And the implication seems to be that their motives lie outside the case record and have little to do with the legal issues involved. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
At no point in these proceedings has any party disputed that the case arises under title 11; nor, indeed, have they offered any reason why Rule 1001 would not apply. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
With serial rescheduling and now a relist, the case clearly has someone’s attention. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Even if they do not, the justices deserve credit for the effort.Despite the puzzlement with which the Court’s order has generally been greeted, in an important sense it is quite ordinary. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:25 am
The published ruling in In re Collier (Docket No. 328172) makes two things clear: before the state can infringe on the constitutionally protected parent-child relationship, due process requires an adjudication trial on the parent’s fitness, and challenging a termination of rights order is not an impermissible “collateral attack” on the trial court’s exercise of jurisdiction when the parent has effectively been… [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:24 am
As a result, the case has been sent back to the Ontonagon Circuit Court, Family Division, for a new adjudication hearing. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Colorado, 22-O-144, has now been relisted (probably) three times since briefing was completed. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. is an important case on the Supreme Court’s docket that employers absolutely need to monitor. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 pm
We have been tracking the developments (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here) in this case since its inception. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Tune in next month to see if it has this time! [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Smith’s case has hit a speed bump on the GVR highway. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Another popular activity with the Nine has been trying to figure out what the Hobbs Act can prohibit. [read post]
