Search for: "DOE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al"
Results 201 - 220
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard oral argument in Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm
National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
The trial court goes on to note that: “GSK does not challenge Dr. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Under section 5(e) of the CPA: (e) there is a representative plaintiff or defendant who, (i) would fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class, (ii) has produced a plan for the proceeding that sets out a workable method of advancing the proceeding on behalf of the class and of notifying class members of the proceeding, and (iii) does not have, on the common issues for the class, an interest in conflict with the interests of other class members. 1992, c. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
Crown Corr., et al., (U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The cases are Coalition for Responsible Regulation Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 6:27 pm
The Kinston case, LaRoque, et al., v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
KEITH LOWELL, ET AL. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Ft. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:35 pm
Usama bin Laden, et. al., Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, also known as the Islamic State of Afghanistan, (No. 09-4958-cv)). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
See Town of Barnstable, et al, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Microsoft et al.[25] In Motionless Keyboard, the inventor of a new keyboard showed his keyboard to investors, a friend, a business partner and a typist prior to filing an application. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 9:50 pm
Kucinich et al. v Obama et al. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Amicus brief of Columbia Legal Services et al. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
As an aside, Judge Kennedy is the first judge before whom I did a civil jury trial, in 1997 in the District of Columbia Superior Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Igartúa, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85… [read post]
