Search for: "DUKES v. PAGE" Results 201 - 220 of 382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 2:29 am by INFORRM
Image Rights and Data Protection, NUS Law Working Paper No. 2017/010, Number of pages: 21 Posted: 25 Aug 2017, David Tan, National University of Singapore (NUS) – Faculty of Law. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Steve Bainbridge
The opinion then goes on for page after page of learned discourse on the importance of Presidential power to oversee the Executive Branch. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:22 am by Ashby Jones
For instance, there’s James Cox, a securities-law expert and professor at Duke University Law School. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice John Marshall Harlan II in Poe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Festinger: Duke Nukem case: yes, they should. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
  This was in the case of Claire Page v Woodely and Earley Chronicle. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Frakes and Wasserman had discussed "cohort effects" in 65 Duke L.J. 1601 (2016) :The numerous hiring-year coefficients presented in Table A1 are meant to be interpreted with reference to the omitted hiring-year cohort - that is, the 1993 cohort. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:58 am by Matthew Nelson
While the gaze of the eDiscovery community has been firmly transfixed on the unfolding drama in the Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]