Search for: "David B. Smith" Results 201 - 220 of 954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
  Although stuck at her desk, IPKat friend Ralf Uhrich (Google) was able to source some excellent guest Kats in the form of Franziska Kurz, Hanno Magnus and David Berger who summarize the conference for the IPKat's readers.Over to Franziksa, Hanno and David for their fantastic summary of the day's proceedings:"What remedies fit patent infringement? [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Carl Coleman, Seton Hall University School of Law, Ethical Issues in Managing Vector-Borne Diseases Stacie Kershner, Georgia State University College of Law, Public Health Law and the E-Scooter Epidemic Noah Smith-Drelich, Columbia Law School, Food Tax Substitution Effects B. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
In November a journalist I know and respect took to social media to air her concerns about the probity of family court process as regards transcripts of hearings. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:34 am
New York: Monthly Review Press, 2017.Smith, Neil. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 12:01 am by Tessa Shepperson
This is a post by David Smith where he discusses this: The PRS is only lightly affected by EU legislation. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by David Post
" Paul's brief argues they got it wrong: Arizona can, consistent with the Constitution, "categorically deny bail based on the charged offense if it can show that defendants charged with that offense categorically present a continuing danger to the community," and "a well-supported charge of sexual assault is a sufficient proxy for future dangerousness": As this Court recognized in Smith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by David Post
" Paul's brief argues they got it wrong: Arizona can, consistent with the Constitution, "categorically deny bail based on the charged offense if it can show that defendants charged with that offense categorically present a continuing danger to the community," and "a well-supported charge of sexual assault is a sufficient proxy for future dangerousness": As this Court recognized in Smith v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:30 am by John-Paul Boyd
About eight years ago I published a document called The Rights and Responsibilities of Self-Represented Litigants that took rights-based approach to the role of litigants within the justice system and the expectations they should have as to how they will be treated. [read post]