Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division" Results 201 - 220 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 1:40 pm by Bexis
Wright, et al (June 7, 2013)(unpublished) and Blake v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Doctors said his care would cost $125,000 every year for the rest of his profoundly disabled life. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
In adopting the ministerial exception, the Court distinguished its prior holding in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:15 am by David DePaolo
You got it - the courts...The rules and requirements are so complex that it is nearly impossible for the less than expert employer to follow them without some mistake.The forms that the Division of Workers' Compensation approves are so intimidating, so legal, and yes, complex, that they scare the injured worker into seeking legal advise.Jose Dubon had suffered injuries to his back in 2003 and 2004 while working for World Restoration. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
”), medical doctors are most interested in the effective treatment of their patients, and thus typically tell it like it is. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At The New Republic (via How Appealing), Matt Ford explains that “a coalition of religious groups and legal scholars is now asking the Supreme Court to overturn its ruling” in Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:08 am by Eric S. Solotoff
The Appellate Division affirmed restating the law on psychological parentage espoused in the VC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 1:15 am by petrocohen
” In New Jersey, employers and their insurance companies have the right to choose the doctors their employees see for treatment of job-related injuries. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:55 pm by Maxine Neuhauser
In a brief  opinion, the Court substantially adopted the Appellate Division’s reasoning in Wild v. [read post]