Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I"
Results 201 - 220
of 12,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 2:01 pm
Nor am I myself doing so. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Again, this is because: (1) Ketamine is FDA-approved as an anesthetic; (2) Drugs with one approved indication can be prescribed off-label for other indications; and (3) The Ryan Haight Act allowed for Schedules II-V controlled substances to be prescribed over telehealth, without a prior in-person examination. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Lochner, Reynolds v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 10:02 am
Mehta, Kaitlyn Box, Mar. 11, 2024 "On November 29, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
B.V. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:23 pm
” In other words, Apple had the burden of showing that its redesign does not infringe. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Marion County or Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:01 am
Does this mean that not having revenue in those two years is an automatic disqualification? [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:50 am
Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:01 am
The proposed regulations anticipate exempting data transactions “to the extent that they are ordinarily incident to and part of the provision of financial services” including: (i) banking, capital-markets, or financial-insurance services; (ii) a financial activity authorized by 12 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:28 am
I made this list for the admin law class I teach this spring at the University of Illinois Chicago because students expressed strong interest in class topics currently at the Court, and not just the hot button issues. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Articles I and II deal with congressional elections and presidential elections. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Articles I and II deal with congressional elections and presidential elections. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm
In particular, what does “intended” mean here. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
As such, they should not face the difficulties and – bluntly put – resistance that, instead, they have been encountering across multiple national courts.The recent and somewhat ‘twin’ decisions of the Rome Court of First Instance in RTI v Vimeo (decision 5700/2023) and RTI v V Kontakte (decision 14531/2023) are examples of both a misunderstanding and misapplication of CJEU case law, notably the 2021 judgment in YouTube, C-682/18 and C-683/18 [IPKat… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
II, § 1, cl. 2] … implicitly authorize the States to enforce Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The CTA regulates “reporting company[ies],” defined as “corporation[s],limited liability company[ies], or other similar entit[ies]” that are either “(i) createdby the filing of a document with a secretary of state or a similar office under the lawof a State or Indian Tribe, or (ii) formed under the law of a foreign country andregistered to do business in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
