Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 201 - 220
of 2,052
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2009, 12:27 pm
Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass’n, Nos. 133466, 133468. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
., Nos. 2011-1471, 1472 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court, Case Nos. 11? [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:00 am
What does this case have that all three of these attorneys found useful? [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
"The Board noted that a retailer who sells goods of others does not necessarily have a trademark for those goods. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 8:30 am
Patent Nos. 6,112,598; 6,167,763; 5,938,624; 6,196,980; 6,248,083; 5,178,159; 5,797,856; 6,976,965; and 7,134,994 were construed: “it does not contact any surrounding rigid structures,” with “‘[s]aid sensor element’ as the “antecedent basis for the word ‘it’” “recess” “surrounding the sensor” “pressure sensitive end of the pressure transducer does not contact any structure other… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:49 am
Murdock, Civil Action Nos. 2:10-cv-01332, 2:10-cv-01333 (S.D.W.Va. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
., Serial Nos. 78227268 and 78227272 (May 13, 2008) [precedential]. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
It does not yield simple policy prescriptions, but it does offer an analytical lens that complements others, such as the need to explicitly consider the gendered nature of—and responses to—each of these phenomena, as well as the need to foreground environmental concerns. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 12:18 pm
Mitchell, No. 116311 – Does waiver of a personal jurisdiction objection operate retrospectively, validating everything that has gone before, or only prospectively? [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:41 pm
So what does this mean? [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:03 am
Although there are concerns the April 30, 2010 order can not be complied with, Justice Davis does not share those concerns. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
., Case Nos. 54520, 55377, 2012 WL 669897 (Nev. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:31 am
., Nos. 2022-1751, 2022-1813 (Fed. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:20 pm
In May 2014, the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) issued the requested Principal Register registrations—Nos. 4,524,540 and 4,532,073—under Lanham Act § 1(a), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
Shabahang, Nos. 136617, 136653, and136983, in a 4 to 3 opinion authored by Justice Hathaway. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, Case Nos. 11-4043 & 11-4057. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:47 am
DOE - 6/20/14. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:45 pm
However, a press release on March 21, 2013 stated:Gevo Inc. announced a significant win in Butamax Advanced Biofuels LLC litigation in Delaware court and a judgment of non-infringement will be entered in the favor of the Englewood, Colorado-based renewable chemicals and advanced biofuels company.Butamax acknowledged that Gevo does not infringe Butamax`s asserted patents under the court's construction of a key claim term in Butamax`s Patent Nos. 7,851,188 and 7,993,889.As a result… [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:38 pm
Patent Nos. 8,074,115 (“the ’115 Patent”) and 8,601,322 (“the ’322 Patent”). [read post]
