Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California" Results 201 - 220 of 313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, upheld the University of Michigan’s consideration of race in its law school admissions policy (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Board of Regents of University System of Georgia a State waives its sovereign immunity when it voluntarily invokes federal jurisdiction by removing a case to federal court, regardless of whether the State has relinquished that immunity in its own courts. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2010); Regents of University of California v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
At another level, such lawsuits (which are usually class actions) almost never articulate any credible basis that the plaintiffs suffered any actual harm.In Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
One of the leaders of that effort was Ward Connerly, a former college regent in California who had spearheaded the successful “Proposition 209″ campaign in his home state   He was joined in Michigan by Jennifer Gratz, a young white woman who had been the lead figure in another 2003 Supreme Court decision, Gratz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:42 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 Non Disclosure of Agency Documents: In response to a demand for University documents potentially relevant to a University issued study on the economic effects of Proposition 2 (on the November 2008 statewide ballot), the Regents of University of California successfully argued that certain internal documents did not have to be disclosed under the Public Records Act. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:05 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
On November 15, 2012, a deeply divided Sixth Circuit ruled, 8-7, that the measure violated equal protection under the political process theory because equal protection does not permit the kind of political restructuring that the measure affected (Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the University of Michigan, 96 EPD ¶44,674). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:37 am by Heidi Henson
On November 15, 2012, a deeply divided Sixth Circuit ruled, 8-7, that the measure violated equal protection under the political process theory because equal protection does not permit the kind of political restructuring that the measure affected (Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the Univ of Michigan). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 446: There was a lack of substantial evidence to support the conclusion that the impacts to parks would be less than significant. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:28 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Constitution (Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the University of Michigan, November 15, 2012, Cole, R). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am by Bruce Khula
Regents of the University of Michigan, et al. (6th Cir., Case Nos. 08-1387/1389/1534 & 09-1111, Nov. 15, 2012) (PDF). [read post]