Search for: "Does 1 - 64" Results 201 - 220 of 2,792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2009, 6:43 am
Brown, 64 F.3d 1083, 1086 (7th Cir. 1995) (using the Buie scenario as an example of the kind of intrusion that is justified by a lower degree of suspicion). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:29 am
June 17, 2008): Based on a balancing of these factors, the court finds that it does not have "a high level of confidence that the warrant in fact would have issued. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:07 am by Zachary Spilman
., 2011) (an offense under Clause 1 or 2 of Article 134, UCMJ, must state the applicable terminal element) is inapplicable where the accused pleads guilty. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” ’773 Application, Request for Rehearing, filed Jan.22, 2018, at 3 (J.A.64). [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:48 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [1] In tables 7 and 8, “Gov’t below”: (a) includes §5K1.1 Substantial Assistance Departures, §5K3.1 Early Disposition Program Departures and other government-sponsored below-range sentences; (b) does not include Rule 35 reductions for cooperation with the government that take place after sentencing. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
Ericksen last October held a 64-minute video hearing and then took the line speed case under advisement. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:56 pm by Jim Walker
Questions (1) Does Spectrum OTS in fact have MOB system which automatically alerts bridge of overboard passenger? [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:26 am
See Harris, 886 N.E.2d at 963-64 (Fourth Amendment was not implicated because a reasonable passenger "would feel free to decline to provide his driver's license," "even upon realizing that the driver of the car in which he ha[d] been riding [was] about to be arrested," in that a request for identification is "facially innocuous" and does not cause the passenger "to feel intimidated or threatened. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:08 pm
It also recalled that in deciding whether an agreement is prohibited by Article 81 §1 EC, there is no need to take account of its actual effects once it appears that its object is to prevent, restrict or distort competition within the common market (Joined Cases 56/64 and 58/64 Consten and Grundig v Commission, and Case Câ€â [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., 64 Cal. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:36 pm by Brandon W. Barnett
It does not reflect new law on the subject, but is helpful as a refresher. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 3:01 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Marijuana DUI  Marijuana DUI is one of the more complicated situations because – how does a police officer determine when you’ve consumed more marijuana than you should? [read post]