Search for: "Does 1-19" Results 201 - 220 of 19,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2021, 3:30 pm by Peter J. Brown and Alexander Volberding
Second, Cal/OSHA provides that the employer does not need to offer employees COVID-19 testing in or at their worksite following a “close contact” exposure or a COVID-19 outbreak, but can offer such testing at off-site locations. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:00 am by HRWatchdog
The new two-year version does not necessarily go into effect on January 1; instead, it goes into effect when the Office of Administrative Law has reviewed and approved the text. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 9:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2013, 10(1), 1-19; Boston Univ. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:37 pm by Aurelia J. Schultz
  The Geneva courses do not begin until 1 July. [read post]
Seyfarth Synopsis: Two big changes are on the horizon for California employers:(1) changes to the COVID-19 general exposure notification requirements and (2) a proposed “permanent” Cal/OSHA COVID-19 standard to take effect January 1, 2023-2025. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jan. 19, 2007)(Utah).Appeal of conviction for possession of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:22 am by Berry Law
How Much Money From Survivor Benefits Does a Qualifying Child Receive? [read post]
9 May 2018, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Under Section 19(h)(1), the Commission may commence an administrative disciplinary action against an exchange, but the section does not authorize claims by private parties. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 2:22 pm by Gene Takagi
Here are some of the highlights from the American Bar Association Exempt Organizations Committee meeting held on January 19, 2024 as part of the ABA Midyear Tax Meeting. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:31 am by Heather Douglas
  The post What Obligations Does the Court Have to Self-Represented Litigants? [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:17 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Board does not agree with this finding.2.2 The Board considers at least the following features of claim 1 to be o [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm by T. Doyle
The ERB applies a three-part test for determining confidential employee status: (1) Does the employee provide assistance to a person who formulates, determines, and effectuates management policies in the area of collective bargaining? [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 10:40 am by Gregory B. Williams
February 19, 2021), the Court granted Defendant’s motion to strike barring Plaintiff from asserting, and its expert from opining on (1) any theory under the doctrine of equivalents (“DOE”) other than for the terms “user system” and “range of tolerance” and (2) any theory of infringement relying on the graphical user interface (“GUI”) of third party products or generated by server software. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:25 am by Gene Quinn
This does not require that Apple themselves engaged in direct infringement, otherwise direct infringement and inducement would be one and the same theory, which they are not. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:26 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Chmiliar, but Justice Mackinnon distinguished it because it did not involve the COVID-19 vaccine, which arise in “an exceptional, time sensitive public health emergency generated by a virus which does have life and death consequences. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:03 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
  Unlike the EEOC’s past guidance which focused on “long COVID,” this new EEOC technical assistance focuses more broadly on COVID-19 as a general virus that does not resolve quickly. [read post]