Search for: "Does 1-2, inclusive" Results 201 - 220 of 4,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2014, 10:23 am by Thomas Kaufman
Plaintiff’s argument against the application of the exemption addressed only the “1-1/2 times minimum wage” component of the exemption and not the “majority commissions” prong. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
College X subsequently advised Student B that, after a thorough investigation, it had determined, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Student B had violated College X's Policy and that College X would contact College Y and provide it with a redacted copy of the investigation report and record documents.Student B initiated a CPLR Article 78 proceeding seeking, among other things, [1] to annul College X's determination, contending that it was arbitrary and capricious and… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
College X subsequently advised Student B that, after a thorough investigation, it had determined, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Student B had violated College X's Policy and that College X would contact College Y and provide it with a redacted copy of the investigation report and record documents.Student B initiated a CPLR Article 78 proceeding seeking, among other things, [1] to annul College X's determination, contending that it was arbitrary and capricious and… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
College X subsequently advised Student B that, after a thorough investigation, it had determined, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Student B had violated College X's Policy and that College X would contact College Y and provide it with a redacted copy of the investigation report and record documents.Student B initiated a CPLR Article 78 proceeding seeking, among other things, [1] to annul College X's determination, contending that it was arbitrary and capricious and… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
College X subsequently advised Student B that, after a thorough investigation, it had determined, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Student B had violated College X's Policy and that College X would contact College Y and provide it with a redacted copy of the investigation report and record documents.Student B initiated a CPLR Article 78 proceeding seeking, among other things, [1] to annul College X's determination, contending that it was arbitrary and capricious and… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:05 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: I-485 Adjustment of Status / I-140 (EB-2 Category) / Schedule A  EMPLOYER: Nursing Care Facility BENEFICIARY: Filipina Nurse Manager LOCATION: Houston, TX Our client was an F-1 student from the Philippines. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
Does it give examiners extra power to refuse to consider amendments? [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am by Diane Tweedlie
The opposition was filed based on the grounds of Article 100(b) (lack of sufficient disclosure) and 100(a) EPC in conjunction with Articles 52(1) and 54(1),(2) EPC (lack of novelty), and on the following sole document:D1: EP 2 327 810 A1.III. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 pm by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
Importantly, the CRTC appears to have agreed that the mere inclusion of these types of features does not require enhanced consent. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:02 am by Administrator
Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District, 2019 BCCA 66 (38601) Does the doctrine of good faith performance apply here. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:18 am by Administrator
(d) of the definition of “employee” in s. 2(1) of the Public Service Labour Relations Act infringes s. 2 (d) of the Charter, and is not justified under s. 1 Labour Law: (federal) Expenditure Restraint ActMeredith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:38 am
In a decision issued on February 1, 2010, the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit confirmed that under New York law some policy provisions, although placed outside of the policy's “Exclusions” section, may nonetheless be considered an exclusion and, therefore, subject to the timely disclaimer and denial requirement of NY Insurance Law § 3420(d)(2). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
But I think the above establishes two points: (1) That to university officials charged with “equity and inclusion” at Connecticut College, the Pessin controversy really is about furthering the pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel cause; and (2)  as is  so often the case, “inclusion” (or “diversity”) is code at Connecticut College for trying to promote left-wing ideological views as campus orthodoxy, at the expense of… [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
There are two parts: (1) “unspecified,” which promotes privacy for individuals who prefer not to disclose their gender identity; and (2) “another gender identity,” which promotes clarity and inclusion for those who wish to signify that they do not identify as male or female. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:13 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
Evidence of the continued underestimation of the impact of the legislation by the Workers' Compensation Commission is that the notice states that the proposed action has 1) no economic impact, 2) minimal or no economic impact on small businesses and 3) no impact on individuals with disabilities. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:18 am by Ralph Behr, Esq
The legal questions in any analysis are: 1) Rules of class designation; and, 2) Fairness in individual risk assessment. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 11:01 pm by Pietro Franzina
Ingrid Wiertz, Case C-4/14), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) clarified the interpretation of Article 1(2) and Article 49 of Regulation No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matter (Brussels I), corresponding to Articles 1(2) and 55 of Regulation No 1215/2012 (Brussels Ia), as well as the interpretation of Article 47(1) of Regulation No 2201/2003 on jurisdiction and the… [read post]