Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2019, 8:35 am
" It does not give "full weight" in its metrics to jobs that were funded by the law school. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:53 am
If you take a trip to the "James Dean" trademarks registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office, you'll see that there are just two trademarks still "live", for use in connection with "giftware - namely, porcelain plates, mugs and figurines" and "clothing, namely T-shirts, jackets and headwear", respectively.Probably reading a guide to the Top5 ways you can breach the law on Twitter without knowing itFollowing Twitter's repeated refusal to suspend the @JamesDean account,… [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Analysis Liberally construing Carter's brief, we interpret Carter to assert the following points: (1) The agreement does not require an arbitration order to issue before an arbitration may be initiated under the arbitration clause [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:42 am
(1)-(2) were, in fact, “clearly without merit and hardly worth addressing,” since that wasn’t what plaintiffs were arguing. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 11:31 am
The high court takes about 1% of the cases it is asked to take. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
.):1. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:06 am
” J.A. 43. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:33 am
J.A. 13, Appellee’s Br. 43. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 10:06 am
On multiple occasions, the Kasich Administration has indicated the new JobsOhio brownfield grant program will closely approximate the size of the old Clean Ohio program- roughly $43 million annually. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
§ 1202 Relief for Unfair Competition Under Section 43(a) of The Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:59 pm
In the final judgment the trial court reiterated the same seven declarations:1. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:15 am
I like Avecia; it does some equity in these kinds of cases. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
ISBN 978-1-107-10310-8 (hardbound) $92.00; ISBN 978-1-107-50126-3 (paperback) $34.00. [read post]
9 May 2023, 10:30 am
Well, Bloomberg Law thinks it does. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Kali Singh [(1977) 1 SCC 57], Mr. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:30 am
Section 1. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:30 am
Section 1. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 8:25 am
On the contrary, the comparison must be made by examining each of the marks in question as a whole… The Court of Justice has made clear that the fact that an element is not negligible does not mean that it is dominant, just as the fact that an element is not dominant by no means implies that it is negligible’ (paragraph 29) ‘Where a sign consists of both figurative and word elements, it does not automatically follow that it is the word element which… [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
The order does not identify the purpose for which the court found the letters to be relevant; i.e. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:48 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
