Search for: "Dunn v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2007, 6:22 pm
In 1972, in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 9:19 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am
SEC, the Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that the SEC’s administrative law judges (“ALJ”) are “officers of the United States,” and thereby subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am
First up is Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:01 pm
Dunn, 2012 NCBC 16, Regions Bank v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:50 am
United States threatened to have a dangerous chilling effect on the everyday functioning of our democratic system. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In this regard, New York v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:27 am
Dunn). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
RAC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
P'ship v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
P'ship v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:31 am
It is well settled that "[a] subrogee acquires all rights, defenses and remedies of the subrogor and is subject to any claims or defenses which may be raised against the subrogor" (Servidori v Mahoney, 129 AD2d 944, 945 [1987]; see United States Fid. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
The effects have been profound, especially with respect to the role of states, and especially of the United States as its long time position in global affairs undergoes significant change. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The decision is about likelihood of confusion, reputed trade marks' extended protection, and passing off.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]
