Search for: "Ellis v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Also on the programme is seasoned veteran Ken Adamo (Kirkland & Ellis LLP), whose lucid lectures have the persuasive flavour of advocacy about them. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
By its own terms, Georgia’s stalking statute “shall not apply to persons engaged in activities protected by the Constitution of the United States or of this state. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The United States Treasury Department has cited ransom amounts that, taken together, put the total at around $165 million over the same period. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Under a proposed settlement agreement filed with the court Monday, April 21, giant truckload carrier Swift Transportation Company would pay $4.4 million to resolve class allegations that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act in its handling of criminal background checks for online applicants (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co of Arizona, LLC, ED VA). [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:36 am by Joy Waltemath
Because the EEOC’s Sec. 12112(b)(6) claim was not premised on attendance but rather on the employer’s alleged 100-percent healed requirement, the 12-month policy could be considered an impermissible qualification standard and not an essential function, a federal district court in Illinois, denying the company’s motion to dismiss (EEOC v United Parcel Service, Inc, February 11, 2014, Ellis, S). 12-month leave policy. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:14 am by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
When the United States declared independence, Black wrote, Parliament’s “transcendant [sic] powers” were transferred to the states, who now enjoyed “supreme and unlimited” authority. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 10:28 am by Nick Rosenkranz
United States, locating the treaty issue within the larger context of sovereignty and federalism. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am by Lai Yip
(“Newegg”) in TQP’s suit for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,412,730 (the “’730 Patent”). [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
” Most of the surface waters of the United States will fail the generic E. coli standard either persistently, predictably during certain times of the year or intermittently. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Courtney Minick
Said and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The subject is preemption – specifically the the United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]